Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen 3 Max for Reasoning

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen 3 Max for reasoning: which is better in 2026?

A head-to-head look at Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen 3 Max for reasoning. Benchmarks via artificialanalysis.ai, pricing as of May 2026. Compare AI models like these inside Admix.

Quick verdict

For reasoning in May 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 edges out Qwen 3 Max on the intelligenceIndex metric. Close second with stronger long-context reasoning.

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaudeQwen
Intelligence index76.972.1
Coding index82.371.0
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Speed (tok/s)88130
Input $/M$15.00$0.50
Output $/M$75.00$2.00
ReleasedApr 23, 2026Feb 28, 2026

How they handle reasoning

Claude Opus 4.7: Close second with stronger long-context reasoning.

Qwen 3 Max: Strong open-source alternative. The main caveat is less polished english writing.

Cost per 1,000 queries

Assuming 1,500 input and 800 output tokens per query:

  • Claude Opus 4.7: $82.50 per 1,000 queries
  • Qwen 3 Max: $2.35 per 1,000 queries

Verdict by sub-task

  • Best raw quality on reasoning:
  • Best price: Qwen 3 Max
  • Longest context: Claude Opus 4.7
  • Fastest: Qwen 3 Max

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Qwen 3 Max for reasoning?

On May 2026 benchmarks (artificialanalysis.ai), Claude Opus 4.7 ranks higher than Qwen 3 Max for reasoning on the intelligenceIndex metric. The gap is small enough that the choice often comes down to price, context length, and tone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen 3 Max?

Claude Opus 4.7 costs $15.00 input and $75.00 output per million tokens. Qwen 3 Max costs $0.50 input and $2.00 output per million tokens.

Can I use both Claude and Qwen in one app?

Yes. Admix is a multi model AI chat aggregator that lets you run Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen 3 Max side by side under one subscription.

Sources

Benchmarks from artificialanalysis.ai (May 2026).

Related

Try both Claude and Qwen in Admix

One subscription, side-by-side answers, no API plumbing. From $8.99/mo.

Try Admix free