Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen 3 Max for coding: which is better in 2026?

A head-to-head look at Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen 3 Max for coding. Benchmarks via artificialanalysis.ai, pricing as of May 2026. Compare AI models like these inside Admix.

Quick verdict

For coding in May 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 edges out Qwen 3 Max on the codingIndex metric. Tops every agentic coding benchmark and handles multi-file edits cleanly.

Side-by-side specs

Spec	Claude	Qwen
Intelligence index	76.9	72.1
Coding index	82.3	71.0
Context window	1M tokens	1M tokens
Speed (tok/s)	88	130
Input $/M	$15.00	$0.50
Output $/M	$75.00	$2.00
Released	Apr 23, 2026	Feb 28, 2026

How they handle coding

Claude Opus 4.7: Tops every agentic coding benchmark and handles multi-file edits cleanly.

Qwen 3 Max: Strong open-source alternative. The main caveat is less polished english writing.

Cost per 1,000 queries

Assuming 1,500 input and 800 output tokens per query:

Claude Opus 4.7: $82.50 per 1,000 queries
Qwen 3 Max: $2.35 per 1,000 queries

Verdict by sub-task

Best raw quality on coding:
Best price: Qwen 3 Max
Longest context: Claude Opus 4.7
Fastest: Qwen 3 Max

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Qwen 3 Max for coding?

On May 2026 benchmarks (artificialanalysis.ai), Claude Opus 4.7 ranks higher than Qwen 3 Max for coding on the codingIndex metric. The gap is small enough that the choice often comes down to price, context length, and tone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen 3 Max?

Claude Opus 4.7 costs $15.00 input and $75.00 output per million tokens. Qwen 3 Max costs $0.50 input and $2.00 output per million tokens.

Can I use both Claude and Qwen in one app?

Yes. Admix is a multi model AI chat aggregator that lets you run Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen 3 Max side by side under one subscription.

Sources

Benchmarks from artificialanalysis.ai (May 2026).

Try both Claude and Qwen in Admix

One subscription, side-by-side answers, no API plumbing. From $8.99/mo.

Try Admix free